I WILL LIKE TO EDUCATE THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN CALLING SANUSI A MAYHEM, FOR THOSE WHO SAY SO DO NOT THE ETHICS OF BANKING. AM ALMOST THRU WITH MY POST GRAD COS IN BANKINH AND FINANCE AND AM ALSO A BANKER.
1)1STLY AM NOT HAPPY THAT INTER AND OCEANIC SACKED FELLOW COLLEAGUE OF OURS
2)THE SITUATION IN WHICH BANKS FIND THEMSELVES ARE COS BY THEMSELVES, REMEMBER SANUSI WAS ALSO AN MD AND NEVER HAD PROB WIT THOSE AFFECTED BANKS MD, SO NO ISSUE OF VEXATION,
3)THIS BANK WENT AGAINST BANKING RULE
A)THEY LOST OVER 350BILLION EACH COMPARED TO OTHER BANKS 25BILLION -45BILLION (WAT A BIG GAP)\
B)THIS BANK GAVE LOAN TO COMPANY WHICH THEIR DIRECTOR HAD VESTED INTEREST(NOTE THEIR IS NOTHING WRONG WIT THAT ONLY IF,I SAY ONLY IF THE DIRECTOR DECLARE THEIR INTEREST IN THIS COMPANY TO CBN AUTHORITY) BUT THEY DID NOT AND THEY NEVER REPAID THIS LOAN
C)THAT BANKS GIVING LOAN SHOULD NOT GIV MORE THAN 15% OBILIGOR LIMIT(MORE THAN 15% OF SHAREHOLDERS FUND) SO IS 350 BILLION MORE THAN SHAREHOLDERS FUND.BUT THIS BANK GAV MORE 2 TIMES ITS SHAREHOLDER FUND
D)THAT ANY LOAN GIVIN MUST HAVE COLLATARAL BUT THEY GAV LOAN WIT OUT A SINGLE A ONE(HOW CAN A BANK GIV A LOAN TO A COMPANY WITH LESS THAN 2 MILLION NAIRA WORTH IN SHARE CAPITAL, A LOAN OF 2BILLION. NOT JUST ONE COMPANY) ABA
NOW WHO IS THE CAUSE OF ALL THIS SACK
IF THE BANKS WHERE HEALTHY THEY WOULD VE ABSORBED THE SHOCK OF ECONOMY CRUNCH
THEY CAN NOT COPE WIT HIGH OPERATIONAL COST IT JUST SIMPLES ECONOMICS PRINCIPLE COS BY THEIR PREVIOUS MD
SO LETS KNOW WHO TO BLAME
THANK YOU