@9jah, u re just desperate to make a point which neva exist. Pls read my post well.
(1).Cut off pt is 95 cos a lot made 95 n above.(2) cut off pt could b as high as 95 n low as 45 cos it performance dependent.
Pls @ 9jah wat is d contradictory element in my last post?
Success is nt final, failure is not fatal.Its nt over untl its over.I Made 100%; prayer pt is to b among d number..contradictory? Mtcheew
Enough of †ђξ advertisement @ LABALABA,we all know you have 100%,shey make we dey cry? So those who dnt make it to that cut off shld forget about it abt? Lemme tell you,if they wanna use 95% dey wld have called u guys ever since,By †ђξ grave of God they will be lenient to consider 80 or 85% to come for †ђξ skills test.Enof of †ђξ boasting! I rest my case............
Most of u guys are wicked. U all have d dragnet leaked questions but none of u want to send it to us after our request.
Bcos of ur undue advantage, u are now suggesting 95% cut-off mark abi. Most of u all already know d answers before d exam.
Calculators were also not allowed too. Shame on all of u cheaters. U dont want to help odas abi and u want to get the job. Repercussion awaits u all
maths,english & abstract are not d only basis 2 justify d intellect a 2.1 possesses.This I bliv is just a means 2 get pple who r fit for the skills test.Making 100% here is not a criteria for success @ d skills stage.
@all sending me PMs, i do not have any questions o0. I remember the answers to some questions because I have done most of them several tyms.
Repetition strengthens memory. If some have been following my posts, u ld notice dat i posted some numerical figures (solutions) that i recalled from past attempts. I don't have any leaked questions o0, and i hardly think the said leaked questions are still used by dragnet. Cos if they are still in use, then dragnet is really psychotic.
Ps: "jupiter has or does not have a rocky surface" is not a conceivable option because the passage never specifically mentioned that it either had or doesn't have a rocky surface!
Goodluck to all!
@ all, I too don't have †ђξ cuestions,so I pray mobil will call most of us from 70% A̶̲̥̅̊₪d̶̲̥̅̊ above since calculators were not allowed,pls Baba God my eyes r on you ..........
Okay, i will do this one more time and then stop responding to you. You stated that your reliable source said the cut off was 95. If that's the case, why could it also be as low as 45 as you have also stated. If a lot of people scored 100% like your reliable source told you, why would the cut off possibly be as low as 45 again since "you and your source clearly stated that performance was way above excellent i.e a lot scored 100 and above. The only reason i'm pissed about the rumour on here is that you're giving the impression that it is over for some people that genuinely went in there and did their best without any expo or whatever. Also, we are all not vieing for the same position. Some of us are experienced candidates and i do not think the criteria will be the same for everyone. Even if it is the same cut off, i believe those who went in there without expo will be called so everyone should ignore the 95% cut off yarnzOriginally Posted by LABALABA
Guy, lets end it here. I wish you the best.
@LABALABA. How did you know that you made 100% when the scores are not out yet? Are we not all candidates of the same aptitude test? Are some people candidates and examiners at the same time? Please keep the house informed of this great puzzle. Thanks.
what is LABALABA? Is that the name of person animal place or thing? LABALABA no be who first go police station dey win case, you know it will be very sad if in the end after all your hyper-activeness you don't get employed by Exxon. If I were you I will be ashamed seriously.
U can disaprove my post or comment but insulting my person...dts not fair.
Posting Permissions
345Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote